i’m reading this book right now “non-violence: the history of a dangerous idea” by mark kurlansky and here’s a bit of the beginning that i’ve really been chewing on-would be interested in your insights:
The first clue, lesson number one from human history on the subject of nonviolence, is that there is no word for it. The concept has been praised by every major religion. Throughout history there have been practitioners of nonviolence. Yet, while every major language has a word for violence, there is no word to express the idea of nonviolence expect that it is not another idea, it is not violence. In Sanskrit, the word for violence is himsa, harm, and the negation of himsa, just as nonviolence is the negation of violence, is ahimsa-not doing harm. But if ahmisa is ‘not doing harm,’ what is it doing?
…violence has been one of the primary moves of history, historians and social scientists rarely study the subject of violence. She (Hannah Arendt) suggested that this was because violence has been such a mainstay of human activity that it was ‘taken for granted and therefore neglected.’ Violence is a fundamental of the human condition, whereas nonviolence is merely a rarified response to that reality. What does this mean? If we lived in a world that had no word for war other than nonpeace, what kind of world would that be?
….Nonviolence is not the same as pacifism, for which there are many words. Pacifism is treated almost as a psychological condition. It is a state of mind. Pacifism is passive; but nonviolence is active. Pacifism is harmless and therefore easier to accept than nonviolence, which is dangerous. When Jesus Christ said that a victim should turn the other cheek, he was preaching pacifism. But when he said that an enemy should be won over through the power of love he was preaching nonviolence.
…Mohandas Gandhi invited a word for it, satyagraha from satya, meaning truth. Satyagraha, according to Gandhi, literally means ‘holind ong to truth’ or ‘truth force.’ interestingly, although Gandhi’s teachings and techniques have had a huge impact on political activists around the world, his word for it, satyagraha, has never caught on.






